When the Macrons slide into the Delaware Superior Court, it isn’t for a Sunday cruise—it’s a complete‑throttle defamation fit in opposition to Candace Owens. President Emmanuel Macron and First Lady Brigitte ripped open a 22‑count number lawsuit, alleging Owens’ outlandish claims about Brigitte’s gender crossed each line of decency and rattled their reputation worldwide.
From Wild Conspiracy to Courtroom Clash
In March, Owens revived the absurd “Is France’s First Lady a Man?” principle in a multi‑element YouTube collection titled Becoming Brigitte: Candace Owens. Promoted heavily on X and some other place, the motion pictures racked up millions of views. Now, the Macrons argue Owens used the scandal to reinforce her platform—promoting merchandise and padding her notoriety on the back of “vile fabrications.”
“We’ve requested her to stop for a year,” says Tom Clare, their defamation professional. “Filing suit became our final hotel.”
Allegations & Evidence—Under the Hood
Wild Claims on Stage and Screen
Owens’ Candace Owens podcast episodes and Candace Owens YouTube videos repeated three vital lies:
Brigitte was born Jean‑Michel Trogneux.
The couple are CIA thought‑managed puppets.
Emmanuel Macron is a blood relative of his wife.
Just as a luxurious sedan can’t disguise a missing engine, those baseless allegations can’t face up to real inspection.
Impact on Reputation
The lawsuit accuses Owens of causing “enormous economic damages” through misplaced speaking engagements and international ridicule. Every time the Macrons step out, they face “invasive, dehumanising” whispers—similar to scrapes on a showroom‑clean paint process.
Owens’ Response – Full Throttle Defence
Far from coasting to a forestall, Owens fired back on Instagram with a screenshot of the criticism and the caption: “I will be coming for this wig these days. Stay tuned.” On her Candace Owens podcast, she labelled the in-shape “a determined PR stunt.” Yet in France, two bloggers have already been convicted of similar defamation, and Brigitte gained her enchantment—signalling she won’t pump the brakes.
What’s Next? Trial and Potential Fallout
In US courts, proving “actual malice” means the Macrons ought to show Owens knew the claims had been false. If successful, punitive damages could set a record‑breaking penalty. It’s a high‑stakes marathon, and each aspect is tuning its arguments like race teams prepping for Le Mans.
Conclusion
In legal battles, as on the racetrack, credibility and momentum count the maximum. The Macrons have shifted into high gear—now it’s Candace Owens’ flow. Will she retract, or will the judges rev her into steeply priced liability? Either way, this situation sets a contemporary precedent for the manner in which public figures defend their reputations for the duration of borders. As the sector watches, the final results must redefine defamation regulation inside the virtual age—and remind each influencer that spreading wild conspiracies consists of real‑global outcomes.
FAQ
Q1: Who is Candace Owens’ husband?
A: Her husband is George Farmer, former Parler executive and son of Lord Farmer.
Q2: What is “Becoming Brigitte: Candace Owens”?
A: A multi‑component YouTube collection reviving the conspiracy that Brigitte Macron is secretly male.
Q3: Where can I listen to the Candace Owens podcast?
A: Available on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, and different important structures underneath “Candace Owens Podcast.”
Q4: How many perspectives did Candace Owens’s YouTube movies get?
A: Some episodes garnered over 2 million perspectives within days of launch.
Q5: What damages are the Macrons seeking?
A: They’re suing for punitive and compensatory damages, citing reputational and financial damage.
